|
September 2008
Pricing and Competition in the
New Zealand Air Travel Market
This article analyses the impact of
competition on pricing and price discrimination using data on 2053
flights on thirteen New Zealand routes observed in 2006 and 2007.
The following analysis by Pratik Keshav is an interesting example
for the dynamics of competition in an opening closed market.
The study finds
that shorter distance routes have average fares per kilometre significantly
greater than longer distance routes. It is also established that
monopoly routes have average fares up to 20% greater than on a duopoly
with Qantas offering fares on average up to 22% lower than those
offered by Air New Zealand. Further, the analysis finds that shorter
distance routes have a substantial price premium for peak time and
sold-out flights compared to longer distance flights. There is also
evidence of a negative relationship between competition and price
dispersion, consistent with the conventional textbook treatment
of price discrimination. This paper also provides verification of
a fall in average fares in 2007 compared to 2006, following an announcement
of lower Air New Zealand and Qantas fares in early 2007.
Contents:
1.0 Abstract
and Introduction
2.0 First Part, Literature Review
2.1 The Changing Scene in New Zealand Aviation
(Post Deregulation)
2.2 The Proposed Alliance between Air New
Zealand & Qantas
2.3 Impact on Competition
2.4 The Impact of Low-Cost Carriers and
the Rise of B2C in the Airline Industry
2.5 The Arrival of Pacific Blue and Possible
Effects
3.0 The
Database
3.1 Price Information
3.2 Cost Information
3.3 Measure of Market Concentration
3.4 Other Variables
4.0 Econometric
Analysis
4.1 The Setup
4.2 The Results
5.0 Conclusion
1. Introduction
Since the deregulation of the airline industry
in 1986, the New Zealand air travel market has seen four airlines
attempt to compete with the major domestic carrier, Air New Zealand.
Although the first three of these failed, in April 2001 a key rival
in the form of Qantas started flying domestic routes in New Zealand.
This duopoly of Air New Zealand and Qantas was joined on the main
trunk routes by Pacific Blue, a subsidiary of Virgin Blue, from
November 2007.
Air travel markets have undergone fundamental
changes recently. The introduction of the low-cost business model
by Southwest Airlines in the U.S. has been widely adopted by a number
of so called low-cost-carriers. So much so, that this relatively
new business model has challenged the more established 'legacy'
carriers. In addition, the growth of the internet banished the traditional
cheap fare requirement of Saturday night stay-over. Instead, airlines
pioneered the new approach of booking flights through the internet
based one-way fare system. Not only has this allowed the legacy
airlines to reduce their costs, it has also rendered price comparison
easier for travellers by allowing them to quickly identify the cheapest
available flights.
December 2002 marked a key development in
the New Zealand air travel industry, when Air New Zealand and Qantas
submitted applications to both the New Zealand Commerce Commission
(NZCC) and the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC)
for the formation of a 'strategic alliance'. This, in effect, would
have monopolised the New Zealand passenger air travel market. It
was this event that provided the catalyst for this study.
This paper makes use of new data on airfares to analyse whether
competition between the national carrier, Air New Zealand, and the
Australian airline, Qantas, affects prices on domestic New Zealand
routes. Further, it presents a simple model of the standard form
of price discrimination to examine how the dispersion of airfares
varies on routes with different levels of seller concentration.
Additionally, this paper also investigates
whether the domestic airfare structure has been lowered in 2007
compared to 2006. This follows announcements from Air New Zealand
and Qantas in early 2007, in which both airlines claimed to have
lowered their domestic New Zealand airfares.
Using a panel dataset of airfares, this study
finds that the presence of Qantas on domestic New Zealand routes
provides a strong competitive constraint. It also reveals a positive
relationship between market concentration and price dispersion.
These findings have important policy ramifications with the view
that allowing for a greater level of competition would result in
lower average fares and reduced price dispersion. Regarding the
announcements from Air New Zealand and Qantas, it is found that
the average price per kilometre of flights in 2007 is lower than
the price in 2006. However, the results suggest that fare cuts are
not spread across all routes with prices on some routes higher than
they were in 2006.
This research article will be presented as
a two part series. Part 1 will provide a brief chronology of the
New Zealand airline industry as well as a literature review on airline
pricing. Part 2 on the other hand will describe the dataset, the
econometric techniques used and the findings of the study.
 |
| Air New Zealand aircraft in Melbourne. Photo:
Michael Meier |
Contents:
1.0 Abstract and
Introduction
2.0 First Part, Literature Review
2.1 The Changing Scene in New Zealand Aviation
(Post Deregulation)
2.2 The Proposed Alliance between Air New
Zealand & Qantas
2.3 Impact on Competition
2.4 The Impact of Low-Cost Carriers and
the Rise of B2C in the Airline Industry
2.5 The Arrival of Pacific Blue and Possible
Effects
3.0 The
Database
3.1 Price Information
3.2 Cost Information
3.3 Measure of Market Concentration
3.4 Other Variables
4.0 Econometric
Analysis
4.1 The Setup
4.2 The Results
5.0 Conclusion
|
About
the Author
Pratik Keshav is a recent graduate
of The University of Auckland Business School having completed
a Bachelor of Commerce (First Class Honours) degree majoring
in Economics and Finance. The following research was presented
by him as part of his postgraduate studies under the supervision
of Professor Tim Hazledine. Pratik has since moved to Sydney
(Australia) where he currently works at Rabobank.
To contact the author, please use our
comment form
List
of References
|
 |
|